Bill Moyers speaks with Cornel West, Serene Jones, and Gary Dorrien for a fresh take on what our core ethics and values as a society say about America's politics, policy, and the challenges of balancing capitalism and democracy.
<...the reality of the economic crisis is slowly becoming clearer to more people -- and over time it will become even more so.
At some point, the economic crisis may feed back into the financial crisis once again and we're liable to find out that the stress tests were way too lenient and that some financial problem children are back on the disabled list.
As an example of the fact that more people are starting to understand the nature of the economic crisis, Friday's FT carried an article by Mohamed El-Erian titled "American Jobs Data Are Worse Than We Think." He notes that "there are rare occasions, such as today, when we should think of the unemployment rate as much more than a lagging indicator; it has the potential to influence future economic behaviors and outlooks."
Of course, the reason why we have such a problem creating jobs is because the country spent 10-12 years engulfed in bubbles. They created the misallocation of capital and the appearance of health -- when all we were doing was creating more risk.
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/caffe6d4-6769 ... ck_check=1
Now we've got a broken economy and will experience real trouble creating real jobs. One of the shocking developments, El-Erian points out, is the speed with which they have been lost and how fast unemployment has screamed higher. He notes (as to my ballgame analogy): "The unemployment rate will increasingly disrupt an economy that, hitherto, has been influenced mainly by large-scale dislocations in the financial system." That's his way of saying: The big issue now is not the financial but the economic crisis.
As green shoots come and go and don't really yield a lot, more and more folks will start to understand the nature of the problem...>
Bill Fleckenstein
(courtesy of our member Dlry)

There Will Be No Recovery...
"The banks must be restrained, and the financial system reformed, and balance
restored to the economy, before there can be any sustained recovery."
Often a closing comment from our blog, essentially this is what Robert Reich is saying in his recent essay on the economy.
The median wage must increase for consumption to resume, and for this to happen the heavy taxes of the financial sector and the oligarchs on the real economy must be lowered significantly.
There is reason for pessimism that this can happen voluntarily. I have come to the conclusion that there is a pathological drive in some small portion of the population to acquire and control and devour rather than consume, even to their own destruction.
The law sets limits on the speed on highways to protect the many from the reckless and willful behaviour of the few. That we ought not to set limits on the banking system is a remarkable bit of speciousness.
There are obvious questions of how best and how far to limit, and how to detect and prevent and prosecute violations, but the comparison is more valid than obtuse. But it is a poor argument to say that we ought not to do it at all because it is difficult, and perpetrators are always trying to find ways to circumvent the system, especially when it is the aspiring criminal element and their demimonde that is making the argument.
The comparison of this latest epidemic of bad economic behaviour is strikingly reminiscent of the Gilded Age at the end of the 19th century and the Roaring 20's. As you may recall both periods were followed by economic dislocation and a world in flames.
Why we allow this sort of bestial behaviour to ravage the many, in the mistaken support of 'free markets,' where nothing these people touch can remain free and effective and efficient for long, is truly an accomplishment of propaganda and those blinded by ideology.
this is a depression, not a recession
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest